WHO South-East Asia Journal of Public Health
  • 696
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 171-178

Benefits and costs of alternative healthcare waste management: an example of the largest hospital of Nepal


1 Department of Economics, Patan Multiple Campus, Tribhuvan University, Nepal; Centre for Health Economics, Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
2 Centre for Health Economics, Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

Correspondence Address:
Shiva R Adhikari
Centre for Health Economics, Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330

Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/2224-3151.206733

PMID: 28607303

Rights and Permissions

Background: Management of health-care waste is an essential task, which has important consequences for public health and the well-being of society. Economic evaluation is important for strategic planning and investment programming for health-care waste management (HWM). A cost–benefit analysis of an alternative method of HWM in Bir hospital, Nepal was carried out using data recently collected from primary sources. Methods: Data were collected using mixed quantitative and qualitative methods. Costs and benefits were measured in Nepalese rupees. The values of all inputs were costs associated with the alternative HWM. Benefits were defined as the reduction in cost of transportation; money obtained from selling of recycled waste; and risk reduction, among others. Break-even analysis and calculations of benefit–cost ratio were used to assess the alternative HWM. Results: The alternative HWM reduces the cost of waste disposal by almost 33% per month, owing to reduction in the amount of waste for disposal. The hospital earns 3 Nepalese rupees per bed per day. The results suggest that a break-even point for costs and benefits occurs when 40% of the total beds of the hospital are covered by the alternative HWM, if the bed occupancy rate is at least 68%. If the alternative HWM is introduced in the hospital system, hospitals can reach the break-even point at 40 to 152 beds, depending on their performance in HWM. Conclusions: The results show the economic feasibility and financial sustainability of the alternative HWM. This alternative method of HWM is a successful candidate for replication in all public and private hospitals in Nepal.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1155    
    Printed7    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded149    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal