|Year : 2013 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 135-141
Why women do not utilize maternity services in Nepal: a literature review
Rajendra Karkee1, Andy H Lee2, Colin W Binns2
1 School of Public Health and Community Medicine, BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal; School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
2 School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
|Date of Web Publication||23-May-2017|
School of Public Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845, Australia
The structure and provision mechanism of maternity services in Nepal appears to be good, with adequate coverage and availability. Utilization of maternity services has also improved in the past decade. However, this progress may not be adequate to achieve the Millennium Development Goal to improve maternal health (MDG 5) in Nepal. This paper reviews the factors that impede women from utilizing maternity services and those that encourage such use. Twenty-one articles were examined in-depth with results presented under four headings: (i) sociocultural factors; (ii) perceived need/benefit of skilled attendance; (iii) physical accessibility; and (iv) economic accessibility. The majority of the studies on determinants of service use were cross-sectional focusing on sociocultural, economic and physical accessibility factors. In general, the education of couples, their economic status and antenatal check-ups appeared to have positive influences. On the other hand, traditional beliefs and customs, low status of women, long distance to facilities, low level of health awareness and women’s occupation tended to impact negatively on service uptake. More analytical studies are needed to assess the effectiveness of the Safer Mother Programme, expansion of rural birth centres and birth-preparedness packages on delivery-service use. Moreover, it is important to investigate women’s awareness of the need of facility delivery and their perception of the quality of health facilities in relation to actual usage.
Keywords: Millennium Development Goal 5, safe motherhood, utilization, maternal health service, Nepal
|How to cite this article:|
Karkee R, Lee AH, Binns CW. Why women do not utilize maternity services in Nepal: a literature review. WHO South-East Asia J Public Health 2013;2:135-41
|How to cite this URL:|
Karkee R, Lee AH, Binns CW. Why women do not utilize maternity services in Nepal: a literature review. WHO South-East Asia J Public Health [serial online] 2013 [cited 2021 Apr 19];2:135-41. Available from: http://www.who-seajph.org/text.asp?2013/2/3/135/206759
| Introduction|| |
Safe motherhood has been a national priority programme in Nepal since formulation of the National Safe Motherhood policy in 1998. The National Safe Motherhood plan (2002–2017), revised in 2005, formed the basis of the current Safe Motherhood and Newborn Health Long Term Plan (2006–1017). This Safe Motherhood Programme has attracted international support for programmatic activities, policy formulation and infrastructure development to improve maternal health in line with Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 5.
As a result of these programmes, there is good coverage of maternity services across most of Nepal. The Safe Motherhood Programme provides essential maternity services to all women through an extensive four-tiered district health system: (i) sub-health post; (ii) health post; (iii) primary health care centre; and (iv) district hospital. In addition, there are outreach mobile clinics and female community health volunteers at the peripheral level. At the sub-health posts, maternal and child health workers provide antenatal and postnatal care and assist in home deliveries. Auxiliary nurse midwives provide antenatal and postnatal care at health posts, some of which have birthing facilities. The primary health care centres and district hospitals provide antenatal, postnatal and delivery care as well as emergency obstetric services. There has been a substantial growth in primary health care facilities that reach out to peripheral areas.
The Government of Nepal – in partnership with Jhepigo and other nongovernmental organizations – has incorporated birth preparedness and complication readiness packages into the Safe Motherhood Programme. The Government also launched the Aama Surakchhya Karyekram (Safer Mother Programme), which includes two components: the safe delivery incentive programme (initiated in July 2005) and free delivery care for uncomplicated, complicated and caesarean section births at all health facilities capable of providing these services (initiated in January 2009). The incentive programme provides cash to women as well as payment to the health facility.
There has been an increase in the utilization of maternal services over the past decade. For example, antenatal visits, the use of skilled birth attendants and contraceptive usage increased from 9%, 10% and 28.5% in 1996 to 29%, 19% and 48%, respectively, in 2006. An indicator of MDG 5 is to achieve 60% of births by skilled birth attendants by 2015; in 2011 this figure was 36% in Nepal. Utilization of skilled birth attendants varies by place of residence, family income and ethnicity. Delivery at a health facility linked to a referral hospital remains the core strategy of the Safe Motherhood Programme to reduce maternal mortality, since the majority of maternal deaths result from pregnancy-related complications such as haemorrhage, infections, hypertensive disorders and obstructed labour. Therefore, the low utilization of maternity services in Nepal is of great concern.
Three major reviews on factors associated with maternity service use have been published. Thaddeus and Maine reviewed the determinants of maternal mortality and proposed the “three delays”. They classified the factors that account for these delays into four broad categories: sociocultural, distance, cost and quality. Say and Raine investigated inequalities in the use of maternal health care. They found wide urban–rural and rich–poor variations and concluded that such variations were usually framed by contextual issues relating to funding and organization of health care, as well as social and cultural issues. Based on these two reviews and more than 80 original research articles, Gabrysch and Campbell identified 20 potential determinants associated with maternity service usage. These previous reviews also indicated that the impact of determinants is context specific, such that a particular factor significant in one geographical setting might not be relevant in another. The aim of this paper is to review the factors that impede or encourage the use of maternity services in Nepal.
| Methods|| |
Search strategy and inclusion criteria
The electronic databases Medline, EMBASE, Science Direct, PubMed, CINAHL, and BioMED Central were searched for relevant articles. Key words used to identify the four main concepts were: (i) maternal health care (matern*/ obstetric*/ reproduct*/ delivery/ antenatal/ postnatal/ postpartum/ newborn); (ii) health service use (utilization/access*/ health service/ use); (iii) determinants or influencing factors (factor/ determinanť barrier/ quality/ decision); and (iv) geographical area (Nepal). First, a search was conducted by combining the first two concepts in the title and abstract fields using Boolean terms, word truncation and wildcards. A further search then included the other two concepts. All articles were exported to EndNote for criteria analysis. Inclusion criteria of the articles were: (i) published during 1990–2012; (ii) quantitative or qualitative study; (iii) reported in English; (iv) related to Nepal and published in peer-reviewed journals; and (v) antenatal, delivery or postnatal factors as outcomes. The full texts of the potentially relevant articles were retrieved and quality assessment and data extraction were then undertaken.
Conceptual framework on determinants of maternal service use
Since the determinants of maternal service use are context specific, study methodologies vary and thus a formal systematic review of this broad topic was impractical. The results of this review are therefore presented in a narrative form, organized according to the four themes: (i) sociocultural factors; (ii) perceived need/benefit of skilled attendance; (iii) physical accessibility; and (iv) economic accessibility.
The search of the first three concepts (maternal health care, health service use, and influencing factors) in the title and abstract field yielded 19 036 articles ([Figure 1]). When the geographical region (Nepal) was added, the result narrowed to 151 articles. These articles were screened for relevance. Only 21 articles, which are summarized in [Table 1], satisfied the inclusion criteria. The majority of studies were carried out in and around the Kathmandu valley. One study used qualitative methods; some studies employed a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods; others applied quantitative methods including an analysis of secondary data derived from national surveys.
|Table 1: Summary of studies on determinants of maternity service use in Nepal|
Click here to view
| Results|| |
Sociocultural factors include maternal age, marital status, ethnicity, religion, traditional beliefs, family composition, mother’s education, husband’s education and women’s status, Most of the reviewed studies analysed at least one of these factors. Higher female education was found to be positively associated with facility use, while women who delivered at home had a lower level of education.,,,, Higher male education also had a positive effect on service use., The inclusion of husbands in antenatal health education appeared to improve birth preparedness and postpartum visits.
An analysis of the national family health survey data suggested that women’s education and economic status, and extended households, are positively associated with service use. Moreover, sociodemograpitic factors including maternal age, education, parity and wealth were associated with delivery assisted by a skilled attendant, as well as timing and number of antenatal care visits. Thapa et al. described traditional beliefs and customs in the remote western area of Nepal, which had a significant negative impact on the use of maternal health services. They found that many women used an animal shed for delivery, mainly due to cultural belief that the household deity would be angry if delivery took place inside the house, and that menstruation and childbirth were considered to be pollution. The cultural requirement of maternal seclusion up to 12 days after delivery might cause delays in seeking care for postnatal complications in central Nepal. However, ethnicity, age of the mother, ritual observance of menarche, type and size of family were not significantly associated with the place of delivery. Mothers-in-law tended to have a negative influence on service use.
An ethnographic study of childbirth concluded that pregnant women lack the power to demand biomedical care, and that men remain largely uninvolved in the care-seeking process. In our review, few women participated in household decision-making, and even fewer had any control over their own earnings. Although involvement in decision-making had no significant impact on antenatal and delivery care” spousal discussion on family planning and earnings were linked to an increased likelihood of health service use. Similarly, other indicators of women’s empowerment, including age at birth of their first child and education and knowledge about sexually transmitted diseases, could significantly increase the use of maternal health services.
Perceived need/benefit of skilled attendance
A range of factors such as knowledge of pregnancy and health risks, importance given to pregnancy, previous facility use, antenatal visits and pregnancy complications, can affect whether a women perceives the need for facility delivery. Some studies reported that multiparity was perceived as a significant risk factor for a home delivery,,, and associated W1th use of postnatal care. Having an antenatal check-up usually leads to subsequent health service use. However, birth-preparedness interventions that include antenatal counselling on danger signs and preparation activities appeared to exert no impact or marginal impact on skilled attendance. Based on a comparative analysis of the 1996 and 2001 Nepal Demographic Health Surveys, Sharma et al. showed that the use of maternal health services increased during this period, partly because of improved dissemination of maternal health information through various mass media sources. Only one study reported that the structural quality of the nearest health post had an important effect on the use of health services. (Structural quality was assessed in terms of physical infrastructure, number of staff, availability of drugs and provision of maternal and child health clinics.)
Physical accessibility includes place of residence, distance to the health facility and transport availability. Residence in rural and mountainous areas makes it difficult to access health facilities and may be responsible for not seeking maternal care. Improved physical access may thus enhance the use of antenatal care and birth delivery by a trained heaIth-care provider, but further physical advantage would offer only a modest impact. Distance and availability of transport were also found to be important in urban areas for the timely utilization of emergency delivery services.
Economic accessibility encompasses household socioeconomic status, husband and wife’s occupation, family income and cost of facility delivery. The latter includes transportation and opportunity costs of travel time. Higher household economic status was found to be positively associated with facility use., However, one study near Kathmandu found that poverty indicators were not a significant risk factor for home delivery. NO study investigated the effect of direct or indirect cost of delivery, and only one study identified “perceived cost” as a deterrent in seeking care beyond the household. Women’s employment or working status appeared to have a negative influence on the use of health services, and women who work but have no control over the use of their earnings are least likely to receive antenatal and delivery services.
| Discussion|| |
Nepal is a culturally diverse country with 125 recorded ethnic groups. Despite this, detailed investigation of the ethnic and cultural impact on the use of maternal services in the country is lacking. Many traditional beliefs and customs, linked with ethnicity and religion, can influence the effective use of maternity services, primarily the decision to seek care. The effects of ethnicity on the uptake of maternity services have been reported in Guatemala and China., In Cambodia, professional midwives often act as “cultural brokers” because Khmer women use their own vocabulary to describe problems during pregnancy, birth and the postpartum period. In Uganda, adherence to traditional birthing practices and belief that pregnancy is a test of endurance are responsible for insufficient use of maternal services. The main reason for home delivery in slums in Mumbai, India, and in Ethiopia is custom., The mother-in-law usually makes decisions about a pregnant woman’s workload, care-seeking and the delivery process in rural Nepal, while husbands in Uganda and local healers or traditional birth attendants in Bangladesh influence care-seeking.
It is unsurprising that the majority of studies conducted in Nepal and other countries have emphasized sociocultural and demographic factors. On the other hand, emphasis on sociocultural factors can mask the relative importance of factors such as those related to service delivery, where communities may be accused of having poor pregnancy outcomes because of their cultural and social system.
Almost all studies found distance as a deterring factor in seeking maternity care in Nepal. The effect of distance is exacerbated by poor roads and limited availability of transportation vehicles. For these reasons, the expansion of birth centres and maternity services in lower-level health posts may lead to increased service uptake. Such birth centres have increased in numbers but it remains unclear whether they are adequately used for antenatal care and delivery or provide a quality obstetric service. In Uganda, women often by pass local facilities to deliver at a hospital that is further away. Various options of transportation, maternity waiting rooms, together with the combined impact of distance and perceived quality of facility delivery, deserve further investigation.
Economic factors also deter the use of maternal health services, especially in low-income and marginalized communities, In V1et Nam, even with compulsory health insurance, poor women are less likely to deliver in a facility than middle-and high-income women. The provision of free maternity services or reduction in user fees may encourage women with a low income to use appropriate health services. However, there may still be substantial “hidden costs” involved, such as transport and provider fees and costs associated with caesarean section.
Nepal’s Safer Mother Programme has resulted in increased use of maternity services. Elsewhere, initiatives that have significantly increased facility-based deliveries can be seen in Kenya, which implements a voucher programme that enables access to four antenatal care visits, a facility-based delivery including caesarean section, and treatment of delivery complications, and in China, where a cooperative medical insurance scheme includes a maternal health-care benefit package.. Nevertheless, even when free services are available nearby, there is no guarantee that they will be utilized unless deemed by mothers to be beneficial. Further research is therefore required to understand the impact of Nepal’s Safer Mother Programme on the use of maternal services, especially with respect to different castes and economic groups.
Few studies have attempted the complex task of assessing women’s perceived need for health-facility delivery. This can be influenced by pregnancy-related factors as well as distance, cost and quality. A positive perception of the added value of delivery in a facility is usually the motivating factor for women and families to seek maternity care. On the other hand, since pregnancy and childbirth are often considered normal events, if this value is not perceived, professional care is unlikely to be sought.
Birth-preparedness and awareness-raising programmes may help mothers to seek and demand care. Perceived complications and health knowledge,, and women’s intention about where to deliver, were associated with use of professional medical care in Bangladesh. Antenatal counselling, use of a birth plan and access to a social network reduced delays in seeking care for an obstetric emergency in Afghanistan. Unlike Nepal, birth-preparedness packages increased skilled delivery care in Bangladesh Burkina Faso and the United Republic of Tanzania. Further studies are needed to assess the effect of birth-preparedness packages on skilled attendance at birth in Nepal.
| Conclusion|| |
The majority of the studies relating to determinants of maternal service use in Nepal were cross-sectional focusing on sociocultural, economic and physical accessibility factors. In general, increased educational and economic status of couples and antenatal check-up attendance appeared to have a positive influence on the use of maternity services. On the other hand, traditional beliefs and customs, low status of women, long distance, low level of health awareness and women’s occupation tended to have a negative impact on service uptake. However, the relative importance of these factors should be examined in the changing context of culture, values and the health system. More analytical studies are also needed to assess the effectiveness of NepaI’s Safer Mother Programme, expansion of rural birth centres and birth-preparedness packages in delivery-service use. Finally, it is important to investigate women’s awareness of the value of facility delivery and the relation between their perception of the quality of health facilities and actual usage.
Source of Support: Australian Development Scholarship.
Conflict of Interest: None declared.
Contributorship: RK conducted the literature review and drafted the manuscript. AHL and CWB developed the concept, assisted in data extraction and revised the manuscript.
| References|| |
Pradhan A, Suvedi BK, Barnett S, Sharma SK, Puri M, Paudel P et al. Nepal Matemal Mortality and Morbidity study 2008/2009. Kathmandu: Family Health Division, Ministry of Health and Population, Government of Nepal; 2010.
Pant PD, Suvedi BK, Pradhan A, Hulton L, Matthews Z, Maskey M. Investigating Recent Improvements in Maternal Health in Nepal: Further Analysis of the 2006 Nepal Demographic and Health Survey. Calverton, MD: Macro International Inc; 2008.
National Planning Commission/United Nations Country Team of Nepal. Nepal Millennium Development Goals Progress Report 2010. Kathmandu: National Planning Commission, Government of Nepal; 2010.
Nepal Demographic and Health Survey 2011. Kathmandu: Ministry of Health and Population Nepal, New ERA; Calverton MD: ICF International; 2012.
Nepal Demographic and Health Survey 2006. Kathmandu: Ministry of Health and Population Nepal, New ERA; Calverton MD: Macro International Inc; 2007.
Campbell OMR, Graham WJ. Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works. Lancet. 2006;368(9543): 1284-99.
Ronsmans C, Graham WJ. Maternal mortality: who, when, where, and why. Lancet. 2006;368(9542):1189–200.
Thaddeus S, Maine D. Too far to walk: Maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(8):1091–110.
Say L, Raine R. A systematic review of inequalities in the use of maternal health care in developing countries: examining the scale of the problem and the importance of context. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85(10):812–9.
Gabrysch S, Campbell OMR. Still too far to walk: Literature review of the determinants of delivery service use. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2009;9:34.
Furuta M, Salway S. Women’s position within the household as a determinant of maternal health care use in Nepal. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2006;32(1):17–27.
Wagle R, Sabroe S, Nielsen B. Socioeconomic and physical distance to the maternity hospital as predictors for place of delivery: an observation study from Nepal. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2004;4(1):8.
Bolam A, Manandhar DS, Shrestha P, Ellis M, Malla K, Costello AM. Factors affecting home delivery in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Health PolicyPlan. 1998;13(2):152–8.
Matsumura M, Gubhaju B. Women’s Status, Household Structure and the Utilization of Maternal Health Services in Nepal. Asia-Pacific Popul J. 2001;2:52–4.
Tuladhar H, Khanal R, Kayastha S, Shrestha P, Giri A. Complications of home delivery: our experience at Nepal Medical College Teaching Hospital. Nepal Med Coll J. 2009;11(3):164–69.
Thapa N, Chongsuvivatwong V, Geater AF, Ulstein M. High-Risk Childbirth Practices in Remote Nepal and Their Determinants. Women & Health. 2001;31(4):83–97.
Dhakal S, Chapman G, Simkhada P, van Teijlingen E, Stephens J, Raja A. Utilisation of postnatal care among rural women in Nepal. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2007;7(1):19.
Mullany BC, Becker S, Hindin M. The impact of including husbands in antenatal health education services on maternal health practices in urban Nepal: results from a randomized controlled trial. Health Educ Res. 2007;22(2): 166-76.
Neupane S, Doku D. Utilization of Postnatal Care Among Nepalese Women. Matern Child Health J. 2013;17(10):1922–30.
Neupane S, Doku D. Determinants of Time of Start of Prenatal Care and Number of Prenatal Care Visits During Pregnancy Among Nepalese Women. J Community Health. 2012;37(4):865–73.
Mesko N, Osrin D, Tamang S, Shrestha B, Manandhar D, Manadhar, M et al. Care for perinatal illness in rural Nepal: a descriptive study with cross-sectional and qualitative components. BMC International Health & Human Rights. 2003;3(1):3.
Simkhada B, Porter MA, van Teijlingen ER. The role of mothers-in-law in antenatal care decision-making in Nepal: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2010;10:34.
Brunson J. Confronting maternal mortality, controlling birth in Nepal: The gendered politics of receiving biomedical care at birth. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(10):1719–27.
Pandey S, Lama G, Lee H. Effect of women’s empowerment on their utilization of health services: A case of Nepal. International Social Work. 2012;55(4):554–73.
Shrestha S, Banu B, Khanom K et al. Changing trends on the place of delivery: why do Nepali women give birth at home? Reproductive Health. 2012;9(1):25.
McPherson R, Khadka N, Moore J, Sharma M. Are birth-preparedness programmes effective? Results from a field trial in Siraha district, Nepal. J Health Popul Nutr. 2006;24:479–88.
Hodgins S, McPherson R, Suvedi BK, Shrestha RB, Silwal RC, Ban B et al. Testing a scalable community-based approach to improve maternal and neonatal health in rural Nepal. J Perinatol. 2010;30(6):388–95.
Sharma SK, Sawaingdee Y, Sirirassamee B. Access to Health: Women’s Status and Utilization of Maternal Health Services in Nepal. J Biosoc Sci 2007;39(05):671–92.
Acharya LB, Cleland J. Maternal and child health services in rural Nepal: does access or quality matter more? Health Policy Plan. 2000;15(2):223–9.
Hotchkiss DR. Expansion of rural health care and the use of maternal services in Nepal. Health Place. 2001;7:39–45.
Chaudhary P. Accidental-out of- hospital deliveries: factors influencing delay in arrival to maternity hospital. Kathmandu Uni Med X 2005;3(2):115–22.
National Population and Housing Census 2011. Kathmandu: National Planning Commission Secretariat, Central Bureau of Statistics, Government of Nepal; 2012.
De Broe S. Diversity in the use of pregnancy-related care among ethnic groups in Guatemala. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2005;31(3):199–205.
Harris A, Zhou Y, Liao H, Barclay L, Zeng W, Gao Y. Challenges to maternal health care utilization among ethnic minority women in a resource-poor region of Sichuan Province, China. Health Policy Plan. 2010;25(4):311–8.
White PM. Crossing the river: Khmer women’s perceptions of pregnancy and postpartum. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2002;47(4):239–46.
Kyomuhendo GB. Low Use of Rural Maternity Services in Uganda: Impact of Women’s Status, Traditional Beliefs and Limited Resources. Reprod Health Matters. 2003;ll(21):16–26.
Das S, Bapat u, More N, Chordhekar L, Joshi W, Osrin D. Prospective study of determinants and costs of home births in Mumbai slums. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2010;10(1):38.
Teferra A, Alemu F, Woldeyohannes S. Institutional delivery service utilization and associated factors among mothers who gave birth in the last 12 months in Sekela District, North West of Ethiopia: A community-based cross sectional study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2012;12(1):74.
Parkhurst JO, Rahman SA, Ssengooba F. Overcoming Access Barriers for Facility-based Delivery in Low-income Settings: Insights from Bangladesh and Uganda. J Health Popul Nutr. 2006;24(4):438–45.
Annual Report 2009. Kathmandu: Department of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Population, Government of Nepal; 2009.
Parkhurst JO, Ssengooba F. Assessing access barriers to maternal health care: measuring bypassing to identify health centre needs in rural Uganda. Health Policy Plan. 2009;24(5):377–84.
Sepehri A, Sarma S, Simpson W, Moshiri S. How important are individual, household and commune characteristics in explaining utilization of maternal health services in Vietnam? Soc Sci Med 2008;67(6):1009–17.
Krak ME, Mbaruku G, Rockers PC, Galea S. User fee exemptions are not enough: out-of-pocket payments for ‘free’ delivery services in rural Tanzania?Trop Med Int Health. 2008;13(12):1442–51.”
Nahar S, Costello A. The hidden cost of ‘free’ maternity care in Dhaką, Bangladesh. Health Policy Plan. 1998;13(4):417–22.
Witter S, Khadka S, Nath H, Tiwari S. The national free delivery policy in Nepal: early evidence of its effects on health facilities. Health Policy Plan. 2011; 26(Suppl 2):ii84-91.
Bellows B, Kyobutungi C, Mutua MK, Warren C, Ezeh A. Increase in facility-based deliveries associated with a maternal health voucher programme in informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya. Health Policy Plan. 2013;28(2):134–42.
Long Q, Zhang T, Xu L, Tang S, Hemminki E. Utilisation of maternal health care in western rural China under a new rural health insurance system (New Co-operative Medical System). Trop Med Int Health. 2010;15(10):1210–7.
Griffiths P, Stephenson R. Understanding users’ perspectives of barriers to maternal health care use in Maharashtra, India. J Biosoc Sci. 2001;33(03):339–59.
Glei DA, Goldman N, Rodriguez G. Utilization of care during pregnancy in rural Guatemala: does obstetrical need matter? Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(12):2447–63.
Moran AC, Winch PJ, Sultana N et al. Patterns of maternal care seeking behaviours in rural Bangladesh. Trop Med Int Health. 2007;12(7):823–32.
Edmonds JK, Paul M, Sibley L. Determinants of place of birth decisions in uncomplicated childbirth in Bangladesh: An empirical study. Midwifery’ 2012;28(5):554–60.
Hirose A, Borchert M, Niksear H et al. Difficulties leaving home: A cross-sectional study of delays in seeking emergency obstetric care in Herat, Afghanistan. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73(7):1003–13.
Magoma M, Requejo J, Campbell O, Cousens S, Merialdi M, Filippi V. The effectiveness of birth plans in increasing use of skilled care at delivery and postnatal care in rural Tanzania: a cluster randomised trial. Trop Med Int Health. 2013;18(4):435–43.
Brazier E, Andrzejewski C, Perkins ME, Themmen EM, Knight RJ, Bassane B. Improving poor women’s access to maternity care: Findings from a primary care intervention in Burkina Faso. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69(5):682–90.
Hossain J, Ross SR. The effect of addressing demand for as well as supply of emergency obstetric care in Dinajpur, Bangladesh. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 2006;92(3):320–8.
|This article has been cited by|
||Parental Food Beliefs on Pre-School-Aged Children in Kaski District of Nepal: A Qualitative Review
| ||Jib Acharya,Edwin van Teijlingen,J Murphy Murphy,Basma Ellahi |
| ||Journal of Multidisciplinary Research in Healthcare. 2020; 7(1): 1 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Why do women not use skilled birth attendance service? An explorative qualitative study in north West Ethiopia
| ||Biruhtesfa Bekele Shiferaw,Lebitsi Maud Modiba |
| ||BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2020; 20(1) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Andersen’s model on determining the factors associated with antenatal care services in Nepal: an evidence-based analysis of Nepal demographic and health survey 2016
| ||Bidusha Neupane,Sujan Rijal,Srijana G.C.,Til Bahadur Basnet |
| ||BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2020; 20(1) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Maternal and newborn health services utilization in Jimma Zone, Southwest Ethiopia: a community based cross-sectional study
| ||Lelisa Sena Dadi,Melkamu Berhane,Yusuf Ahmed,Esayas Kebede Gudina,Tasew Berhanu,Kyung Hwan Kim,Masrie Getnet,Muluemabet Abera |
| ||BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2019; 19(1) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Empowerment as a Predictor of HIV Testing Among Married Women in Nepal
| ||Roshna Thapa,Youngran Yang,Jeong Hee Kang,Ju-Hee Nho |
| ||Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care. 2019; 30(5): 563 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Predisposing, enabling, and need factors associated with utilization of institutional delivery services: A community-based cross-sectional study in far-western Nepal
| ||Leila Freidoony,Chhabi Lal Ranabhat,Chun-Bae Kim,Chang-Soo Kim,Dong-Won Ahn,Young Ah Doh |
| ||Women & Health. 2018; 58(1): 51 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Hidden Costs of Hospital Based Delivery from Two Tertiary Hospitals in Western Nepal
| ||Jeevan Acharya,Nils Kaehler,Sujan Babu Marahatta,Shiva Raj Mishra,Sudarshan Subedi,Bipin Adhikari,Joan A Caylŕ |
| ||PLOS ONE. 2016; 11(6): e0157746 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Measuring adolescent friendly health services in India: A scoping review of evaluations
| ||Andrea J. Hoopes,Paras Agarwal,Sheana Bull,Venkatraman Chandra-Mouli |
| ||Reproductive Health. 2016; 13(1) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Dengue Contingency Planning: From Research to Policy and Practice
| ||Silvia Runge-Ranzinger,Axel Kroeger,Piero Olliaro,Philip J. McCall,Gustavo Sánchez Tejeda,Linda S. Lloyd,Lokman Hakim,Leigh R. Bowman,Olaf Horstick,Giovanini Coelho,Duane J. Gubler |
| ||PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2016; 10(9): e0004916 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Cross-sectional Serosurvey of Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus IgG in Livestock, India, 2013–2014
| ||Devendra T. Mourya,Pragya D. Yadav,Anita M. Shete,Padmakar S. Sathe,Prasad C. Sarkale,Bramhadev Pattnaik,Gaurav Sharma,Kamlesh J. Upadhyay,Surekha Gosavi,Deepak Y. Patil,Gouri Y. Chaubal,Triparna D. Majumdar,Vishwa M. Katoch |
| ||Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2015; 21(10): 1837 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Why do women deliver in facilities, or not?
| ||MartinW Weber |
| ||WHO South-East Asia Journal of Public Health. 2013; 2(3): 129 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|